The SAP piece on multi-cloud data flow security hits at something we're seeing across both PeopleSoft and S/4HANA shops. The recoverability framing is spot on because too many teams are still building prevention-only postures that assume breaches won't happen. That Agentic AI ERP whitepaper pairs nicely with this digest since the shift from system-of-record to system-of-action requires rethinking authorization models at the workflow levl, not just at the data layer.
That’s a sharp observation. The prevention-only mindset remains far too common, particularly in legacy ERP operations. I really like your point about recoverability; it's the difference between resilience and wishful thinking. Once you assume compromise can happen, your entire architecture starts to look different: backups, role segregation, and access control all move from compliance checkboxes to operational priorities.
And you're absolutely right about the shift to systems of action. As workflows become more autonomous and AI-driven, the real security conversation shifts to a higher level, from authorization at the data layer to authorization at the process and intent levels. That's a significant mindset shift for PeopleSoft and S/4HANA teams, accustomed to guarding tables instead of tasks.
Appreciate you connecting that to the Agentic AI ERP whitepaper from Rimini Street. It provides a valuable framework for how AI-driven workflows will challenge our current identity and policy models. We're heading into a future where "who can act" matters even more than "who can see."
The SAP piece on multi-cloud data flow security hits at something we're seeing across both PeopleSoft and S/4HANA shops. The recoverability framing is spot on because too many teams are still building prevention-only postures that assume breaches won't happen. That Agentic AI ERP whitepaper pairs nicely with this digest since the shift from system-of-record to system-of-action requires rethinking authorization models at the workflow levl, not just at the data layer.
That’s a sharp observation. The prevention-only mindset remains far too common, particularly in legacy ERP operations. I really like your point about recoverability; it's the difference between resilience and wishful thinking. Once you assume compromise can happen, your entire architecture starts to look different: backups, role segregation, and access control all move from compliance checkboxes to operational priorities.
And you're absolutely right about the shift to systems of action. As workflows become more autonomous and AI-driven, the real security conversation shifts to a higher level, from authorization at the data layer to authorization at the process and intent levels. That's a significant mindset shift for PeopleSoft and S/4HANA teams, accustomed to guarding tables instead of tasks.
Appreciate you connecting that to the Agentic AI ERP whitepaper from Rimini Street. It provides a valuable framework for how AI-driven workflows will challenge our current identity and policy models. We're heading into a future where "who can act" matters even more than "who can see."